Here’s a quiz for you: Did you spend at least seven of the last nine months complaining about the way your kids were educated at school?  Did you worry that your kids were spending too much time learning to fill in test bubbles correctly?  Were you ever forced to go to bed knowing you’d have [...]]]>

Here’s a quiz for you: Did you spend at least seven of the last nine months complaining about the way your kids were educated at school?  Did you worry that your kids were spending too much time learning to fill in test bubbles correctly?  Were you ever forced to go to bed knowing you’d have to wake up fifteen minutes early to have your child fill out a homework worksheet you found at the bottom of the backpack?  If you said “yes” to any of these questions, it may be time to take matters into your own hands.  It may be time to devote some of those sunny summer days re-lighting your child’s spark for learning.

The beauty of learning is that it really doesn’t require time spent in a hard chair, or head bent over a textbook.  Learning does, however, require an interest in discovery, some skills of observation, and a willingness to communicate the interesting things you have found with other people.  If you do some of this “work” over the summer, your child will return to school with fresh eyes and a brain that can think up three questions for every one answer it runs across.  Now, as every home schooling parent will tell you, there are plenty of pricey workbooks, science kits, and math games that will strain the budget, so maybe the best place to reclaim learning is with what you have at hand.  Here are some learning ideas that take just a little planning and not a lot of cash.

Yard Math – have your child bring you at least three things in the yard or at a park that have “divisions” or sections.  Leaves (2 sections divided down the middle), citrus fruit cut in half, or even weeds are good examples.  Bugs and spiders can stay outside.  Come up with possible reasons why these things are divided the way they are (you can look up the real reasons later on the internet).  Then use the divisions for a quick lesson in fractions (what fraction does two out of four seeds make).  It’s science learning and math learning in one, and hones those observational skills.  Why are some things in the yard green, and why are some brown?  There are a million-and-one science questions without having to spend a second at a desk.

Become an Expert – Have your child choose one topic they’d like to become an expert on.  Maybe this starts with a question, “I always wanted to know. . .”  Then start looking for answers.  Have your child spend fifteen minutes a day looking up answers to that question, finding out more and more about the topic.  After a month, he or she will know as much as the experts, and will find out how knowledge can make a person feel confident.

Density City – As a way of understanding how systems work in their world, just study a city block.  How many people are expected to fit on the block?  How many cars are there parking spaces for?  How are streetlights spaced apart?  All of these questions your child can answer refer to density, and were asked by planners as the block took shape.  Understanding density helps children recognize that there are reasons for the way things are set up in the city, and to have a critical eye when things are not set up well.

There’s no need to feel intimidated or “bookish” about taking on some responsibility for your child’s learning.  As teachers describe, we are just looking for “teachable moments” where we can follow a sense of wonder with some critical thinking.  Of course, beyond these simple ideas there are the perpetually cool activities such as Owl Pellets (available from Amazon.com), or crossword puzzles for spelling words you can make yourself (plenty of free puzzle sites are listed via Google).  Summer is precious time to re-awaken learning, and will make the weeks seem much more enjoyable than if you didn’t ask those curious questions about the world

For those who read my article last month, you know that I did [...]]]> A recent study by the Department of Education that was reaported in Science Daily reported that 44% of Fourth Graders in the United States are reading below the basic mastery level for their age group.  In California, 59% are reading below mastery.

For those who read my article last month, you know that I did not learn to swim until I was 26-years-old.  The consequences of not learning to read are more immediate and much graver for chilren.  Studies show that the following problems are highly correlated   with poor reading:   poor grades, easily frustrated, difficulty completing assignments, low self-esteem, behavioral problems, increased physical illness, more likely to not like school, more likely to be shy in front of groups of people, failing to develop full potential.

Last month the article referenced developmental issues in learning.  This month I would prefer to focus on behavioral issues in learning.

One of the strongest influences that a parent can have is to model appropriate behavior for their children.  To paraphrase the writer James Baldwin, children often fail to listen to their parents, but they never fail to imitate their parents’ behavior.  This means that what we do is often more powerful than what we say.

Nowhere is this need to model appropriate behaviior more important than with reading.  Studies show that parents who read aloud to their children are more likely to produce students who are better readers.  This can be done with as little as ten to twenty minutes per day.

Parents who read aloud, describe pictures in the book, talk about what was read and relate it to something in their child’s life, and encouraging the child to ask questions about the reading material are also important in helping the child learn to read.

There are also some excellent sites for reading and learning phonics that are available on the internet.  Two of my favorites are ClickN Read and Reading Horizons.  These sites provide stimulating games that help children learn phonics and reading at an amazing pace.

Of course, since you are modeling reading by reading to your chldren, you could also model hitting those websites for your chldren.

Again, I learned to swim at age 26 without any really punishing consequences for my academic and occupational life, but you cannot postpone your child’s reading for that same amount of time.  Read to your child, interact with them about what you have read, and encourage them to use the above websites in order to increase the chances of preparing your child for school–and for life.

This article describes why severe discrepancies between ability and achievement (see below) are no longer required to qualify your child for an Individualized Educational Plan (IEP) at [...]]]> A recent article by Edward Schultz in LDA Newsbriefs concerns new definitions of learning disabilities that must be recognized through the 2004 Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA).

This article describes why severe discrepancies between ability and achievement (see below) are no longer required to qualify your child for an Individualized Educational Plan (IEP) at school, and the author discusses new methods of determining who can profit from special classes or special teaching methods.

PL 94-142, the original law regarding special teaching and classes for students with handicapping conditions, appeared in the 1970′s.  The law was aimed at helping physically challenged students, e.g., those requiring a wheelchair to get around, or those who lacked the muscular control to produce good penmanship, gain access to the comprehensive public school.

However, enterprising educators, psychologists, and others in the helping professions soon realized that there were many students who had no physical challenges, but they did have learning challenges such as dyslexia or poor auditory processing.

Initially, such learning challenged students gained access to the Special Education classrooms with ease.  Generally, these classes were legally mandated to have no more than eight students per teacher.

However, as the number of students in Special Education classes swelled, the money to fund the classes did not.  Schools were faced with the dilemma of limiting the enrollment in Special Education classes in order to maintain the 8:1 ratios without an increase in the funding.  Since physical challenges were more blatant, the most expeditious way of limiting the number of students with learning challenges was to make the definition of what constituted a learning challenge very strict.

For example, in the past, a Sophomore with average intellectual ability would have been required to read on a second to third-grade level in order to qualify for an IEP.  This was the school district’s way of saying that the student’s learning problem met their criterion for a PROBLEM, and that the PROBLEM required special teachers or teaching methods in order to be resolved.  This generated an IEP and placement in a Resource Specialist Classroom or setting outside the general or comprehensive classroom.

After such a strict criterion was used to control the number of students admitted to Special Education classes, only the squeakiest wheels received any grease.  Parents who had their children evaluated by the school district were often told that their children did not qualify for Special Education services because their child did not meet the stringent, and arbitrary, criteria for a learning disability that the severe discrepancy standard had set.

According to Schultz, IDEA included three important new guidelines in identifying students with learning disabilities

• Guideline One:  A severe discrepancy between ability and achievement is not required in determining a learning disability.
• Guideline Two:  The use of a process based on the student’s response to research-based intervention must be permitted.
• Guideline Three:  The use of other alternative research-based methods may be permitted in defining a learning disability.

The author then goes on to present how one such approach, identifying processing deficits, can be used to identify a learning disability in a student who does not have a severe discrepancy between ability and achievement.  That is, under the older, strict rules, the student would not qualify for an IEP.  Under IDEA, this student would qualify for Special Education services.

As a parent, you should be aware of the fact that your child may have been a false negative under the old criteria.  That is, you may have been informed that your child did not qualify for Special Education services because the school district was not aware of IDEA.  If this is the case, you should request another evaluation using the IDEA critera.

If your child is one of those who may have fallen through the cracks, it would help to know some of the factors that are involved in assessing processing deficits.

First, the author presents the concepts of fluid versus crystallized intelligence.  The former refers to how a student performs on a novel task that cannot be performed automatically.  This is often referred to as “thinking on one’s feet” or “on the fly.”

Crystallized intelligence refers to knowledge that has been acquired over time, and it includes mostly language-based information and information that may be recited automatically, such as formal school learning or procedural knowledge, such as how to go through the lunch line at school.

Specific interventions can be generated for deficits in either kind of intelligence.  For example, instruction in problem-solving strategies can often be used to help those with fluid intelligence problems become better at their performance on tasks that they have not seen before.  Teaching ways of relating new information to prior knowledge can help those with deficits in crystallized intelligence.

Other cognitive processes discussed by the author include deficits in the areas of short-term memory and long-term storage and retrieval.

For short-term memory problems, the intervention would be to shorten the instructions to the student, supply them with memory strategies, or repeating the instructions several times.

For long-term storage or retrieval problems, the intervention would be to provide organizers, memory cues, additional practice and additional time for the recall.

Likewise, classroom accommodations for additional test time and note-taking assistance could be the ideal intervention for a student who has a deficit in how quickly they process the information.

In brief, then, legislation passed in the 1970′s regarding help for children with learning challenges is being reevaluated in light of over thirty years of evidence-based practice and new developments in intellectual, cognitive, and educational testing.  In the months to come, this column will explore more specific ways of helping you as a parent to become more knowledgeable about these developments and more competent in getting the help from your public school that your child both needs and deserves.

In the meantime, if you do not wish to wait for the bureaucracy to help your child, there are many tools at your disposal.  These tools range from little or no cost to extremely expensive interventions.

For example, one site developed by neuro-scientists at Stanford and UCSF provides Scientific Brain Training, which provides a 30 day free trial and provides an excellent resource for strategies with processing deficits.

Speech and language pathologists provide tremendous help for many with auditory processing disorders. Reading problems effect all learning yet a program using phonemic awareness combined with intensive systematic phonics instruction can provide significant improvement.  Reading Horizons provides several programs that are fun , effective and use methods backed by educational and neurological research.  They can easily be implemented at home.  They are affordable and guaranteed to significantly boost reading achievement.