Useful information for parents on how to help children and teens with learning disabilities receive appropriate school services. Includes legal and educational resources.
by Dianna Pinkerton
"All disadvantaged and disabled children will have
access to high quality and developmentally appropriate
preschool programs that help prepare children for
school"
(from Goal 1, National Goals for Education, 1990).
Public Law 99-457, the 1986 Amendments to the Education of the Handicapped Act (EHA), addresses the needs of young children with disabilities through two programs: the Handicapped Infants and Toddlers Program for children birth through age 2 and the Preschool Grants Program for 3 to 5 year olds. Together these programs represent an important effort to expand the scope of services available to the nation's youngest children with disabilities and their families. The Handicapped Infants and Toddlers Program, Part H of the EHA, supports the planning, development, and implementation of an interagency system of early intervention services for infants and toddlers who have disabilities. The Preschool Grants Program, Section 619 of Part B of the EHA, is designed to ensure the availability of a free, appropriate public education for all children ages 3 to 5 with disabilities. Both programs provide federal support for meeting Goal 1 of the National Goals: "By the year 2000, all children in America will start school ready to learn." During the 1989-1990 school year approximately 642,000 children were served through these programs (Thirteenth Annual Report to Congress, 1991, p. 84).
The transition from preschool to school can be difficult for a child with disabilities. The preschool environment characterized by small groups and individual attention is replaced by classrooms with more children, fewer adults per child, and greater demand for adapting to general classroom procedures and working independently (Carta, Atwater, Schwartz, & Miller, 1990). Parents and teachers from both receiving and sending programs need to be involved in placement as well as scheduling and facilitating the move (Fowler, Schwartz, & Atwater, 1991). P.L. 99-457 recognizes the importance of preparing children and their families by requiring that specific steps be addressed in each child's individualized family service plan (IFSP) for children from birth through age 2 or individualized education program (IEP) for preschool children.
Family members play a key role in providing
information about the child's abilities, strengths and
weaknesses, and interests. Parental insights complement
information obtained from preschool sources and provide
a broader picture of the child's capabilities and needs.
Identifying specific ways for parents to be involved in
the process is essential to a good transition
(Bernheimer, Gallimore, & Weisner, 1990).
Parents may act as teachers, partners, decisionmakers,
and/or advocates (Shearer & Shearer, 1977). They are
teachers when they reinforce the skills acquired in
preschool, partners when they communicate needs with
school personnel, and decisionmakers when they
participate in the IEP process. Parents can help prepare
the child for the transition to public school by
maintaining and generalizing skills necessary for the
transition. They also serve as a bridge between the two
programs, visiting the new program with their child,
helping the child to become familiar with the new
setting, and discussing concerns and fears connected
with the upcoming change. They can also help bridge the
gap by arranging visits with former preschool friends
and teachers as well as with new classmates. Parents can
help their child develop skills in following directions,
playing independently, attending to task, and self-care.
These skills will help prepare the child for the new
setting (Hains, Fowler, & Chandler, 1988).
Sending and receiving teachers both play important
roles in the transition process. Teacher attitudes,
instructional priorities, and communication with parents
and other members of the transition team will determine
the quality of the child's transition (Hains et al.,
1988). Sending and receiving teachers may have different
goals and priorities, but they play complementary roles
in preparing the child for the move from preschool to
the general school setting.
The sending teacher should find out what skills the
child will need in order to function adequately in the
new setting and implement a program for preparing the
child to develop those skills. Familiarity with the
receiving program is essential in order to design an
appropriate transition curriculum. The sending teacher
can gain a better understanding of prerequisite skills
by visiting the receiving classroom. For children placed
in an integrated setting, behavioral requirements for
successful functioning have been assessed and are
referred to as survival skills. These include being able
to function independently during group instruction,
following classroom routines, completing tasks within an
allotted time period, and working in the absence of
teacher direction. Teaching survival skills as part of
the preschool curriculum helps prepare the child for the
demands of the general school setting (Carta, Atwater, &
Schwartz, 1991). Skill-building activities should be
developmentally appropriate for each child.
The success of the transition preparation is ultimately
determined by the child's adaptation to the new
environment. The receiving teacher's attitude toward and
experience with children with disabilities may be
factors in the success of the child's placement. Some
flexibility will probably be required on the teacher's
part in order to adjust expectations and adapt to the
child's special needs. The sending and receiving
teachers will have the continuing role of acting as
liaisons between programs and with parents. Good
communication and clearly defined goals will facilitate
the preparation for the child's move from preschool to
the general school setting.
The Capstone Transition Process (Johnson, Cook, & Yongue, 1990) is one model that provides clear guidelines for the transition process. The first activity initiates long-range planning by establishing a "transition timeline." This timeline serves as a guide for accomplishing transition activities and can be set up in chart form to track activities. The Capstone Transition Process addresses specific activities beginning 12 months before the move to a new program. The process includes preparation, implementation, and evaluation activities. The initial steps of the process are designed to prepare the participants for their role in the transition. Steps include notifying and preparing parents and teachers from both the sending and receiving programs. Data on the child's needs are collected or updated. A profile of communication procedures, available services, prerequisite skills, and teacher expectations is developed from existing information. The preparation phase of the process culminates with the development by the transition team of an IEP for use as the basis of educational programming in the new setting. Following the IEP meeting, the timeline provides reminders for the transfer of information and records to the receiving program. The final step calls for evaluation of the effectiveness of the process.
References:
Bernheimer, L. P., Gallimore, R., & Weisner, T. S.
(1990). Ecocultural theory as a context for the
individual family service plan. Journal of Early
Intervention, 14(3), 219-233.
Carta, J. J., Atwater, J. B., Schwartz, I. S., & Miller,
P. A. (1990). Applications of ecobehavioral analysis to
the study of transitions across early education
settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 13(4),
298-315.
Carta, J. J., Atwater, J. B., & Schwartz, I. S. (1991,
April). The effects of classroom survival skills
intervention on young children with disabilities:
Results of a two-year follow-up. Presentation of the
Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child
Development, Seattle, WA.
Executive Office of the President. (1990). National
goals for education. Washington, DC: EOP. ED 319 143
Fowler, S. A., Schwartz, I. & Atwater, J. (1991).
Perspectives on the transition from preschool to
kindergarten for children with disabilities and their
families. Exceptional Children, 58(2), 136-145.
Hains, A. H., Fowler, S. A., & Chandler, L. K. (1988).
Planning school transitions: Family and professional
collaboration. Journal of the Division for Early
Childhood, 12(2), 108-115. EJ 368 964
Johnson, L. J., Cook, M., & Yongue, C. P. (1990).
Capstone Transition Process. Unpublished manuscript,
University of Alabama.
Shearer, M. S., & Shearer, D. E. (1977). Parent
involvement. In J. B. Jordan, A. H. Hayden, M. B.
Karnes, & M. M. Wood (Eds.), Early childhood education
for exceptional children: A handbook of ideas and
exemplary practices. Reston, VA: The Council for
Exceptional Children. ED 132 788
Thirteenth annual report to Congress on the
implementation of the Education of the Handicapped Act
1990. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This publication was prepared by Dianna Pinkerton with
funding from the U.S. Department of Education, Office of
Educational Research and Improvement, under contract no.
RI88062007. The opinions expressed in this report do not
necessarily reflect the positions or policies of OERI or
the Department of Education.
ERIC Digests are in the public domain and may be freely
reproduced and disseminated.