Violence in Sports
by Ismat Abdal-Haqq
Sports violence can be defined as behavior which causes harm, occurs
outside of the rules of the sport, and is unrelated to the competitive
objectives of the sport (Terry and Jackson, p.2). Leonard (p. 165)
identifies two forms of aggression in sports. Instrumental aggression is
non-emotional and task-oriented. Reactive aggression has an underlying
emotional component, with harm as its goal. Violence is an outcome of
reactive aggression.
An increase in both frequency and seriousness of acts of violence has
been well documented. Violence is most prevalent in team contact sports,
such as ice hockey, football, and rugby. While most occurrences of
violence emanate from players, others, including coaches, parents, fans,
and the media, also contribute to what has been described as an epidemic
of violence in sports today (Leonard, p. 166).
Considerable research has been done on spectator violence. A central
issue is whether fans incite player violence or reflect it (Debenedotte,
p. 207). The evidence is inconclusive. Spectators do take cues from
players, coaches, cheerleaders, and one another. Spectators often derive a
sense of social identity and self-esteem from a team. Emulation of
favorite players is an element of this identification. Group solidarity
with players and coaches leads to a view of opposing teams as enemies and
fosters hostility towards the "out group" and, by extension, its
supporters, geographical locale, ethnic group, and perceived social class
(Lee, p. 45).
Mass media also contribute to the acceptability of sports. Leonard (p.
166) maintains that the media occupies a paradoxical position. On the one
hand it affords ample exposure to sports-related violence via television,
magazines, newspapers, and radio, thus providing numerous examples to
children who may imitate such behavior. It glamorizes players, often the
most controversial and aggressive ones. Its commentary is laced with
descriptions suggestive of combat, linking excitement to violent action.
On the other hand, the exposure given to sports violence by the media has
stimulated increased efforts to control and prevent such behavior.
Theoretical Explanations of Sports Violence
There are three major theories that seek to explain violent aggression in
sports (Terry and Jackson, p. 27; Leonard, pp. 170-71). The biological
theory, proposed most notably by Nobel prize winner Konrad Lorenz, sees
aggression as a basic, inherent human characteristic. Within this context,
sports is seen as a socially acceptable way to discharge built-up
aggression, a safety valve.
The psychological theory states that aggression is caused by
frustration; it is situational. Frustration results when one's efforts to
reach a particular goal are blocked (Leonard, p. 170). In sports,
frustration can be caused by questionable calls by officials, failure to
make a particular play, injuries that interfere with optimum performance,
heckling from spectators, or taunts by coaches or players.
The social learning theory has received the most empirical verification
(Leonard, p. 171) and maintains that aggressive behavior is learned
through modeling and reinforced by rewards and punishments. Young athletes
take sports heroes as role models and imitate their behavior. Parents,
coaches and teammates are also models who may demonstrate support for an
aggressive style of play.
According to Terry and Jackson (p. 30), reinforcement for acts of
violence may come from three sources:
- The athlete's immediate reference group--coaches, teammates, family,
friends;
- Structure of the game and implementation of rules by officials and
governing bodies;
- Attitudes of fans, media, courts, and society.
Reinforcement may take the form of rewards, such as praise, trophies,
starting position, respect of friends and family. Vicarious reinforcement
may be derived from seeing professional players lionized and paid huge
salaries, in spite of, or because of, their aggressive style of play
(Leonard, p. 171). Players who don't display the desired degree of
aggressiveness may receive negative reinforcement through criticism from
parents and coaches, lack of playing time, harassment by teammates,
opponents, or spectators.
These theories provide a basis for interventions that may curb
excessive aggression, especially among young athletes. Terry and Jackson
(p. 35) suggest that socialization forces, particularly reinforcement,
offer the best focus for intervention. In addition, psychological forces
can be addressed by modifying or controlling situations that produce
frustration.
Children's Involvement in Sports
Ideally children's participation in team sports should be fun, contribute
to their physical development and well-being, help to develop social
skills, and promote a desire for continued involvement with physical
activity. The objective of physical education in schools should be to
encourage development of appropriate exercise habits, with emphasis on the
recreational aspects of physical activities (Roskosz, p. 7).
Unfortunately, compelling evidence suggests that, for many children,
the pressures associated with sports produce low self-esteem, excessive
anxiety, and aggressive behavior. Children may eventually experience
"sports burnout" and develop a lifelong avoidance of physical
activity (Hellstedt, p. 60, 62).
In Hellstedt's opinion (p. 62), these negative outcomes of sports
involvement are caused by adults, particularly parents and coaches.
Lip-service is paid to sportsmanship and having fun, but rewards are
reserved for winning. Often, encouragement to pursue victory is
accompanied by direct and indirect signals that aggressive behavior is
acceptable to achieve it. Hellstedt also suggests that anxiety about
winning impedes performance and makes players more susceptible to injury.
Physicians have noticed an increase in sports-related injuries in children
(Hellstedt, p. 59).
What Can Coaches and Physical Educators Do to
Curb Violence in Youth Sports?
Physical educators and coaches are in a key position to lay the groundwork
for positive attitudes in sports. Guidelines for teaching children to shun
violent behavior in sports include:
- Put sports in perspective.
Coaches should not emphasize winning at all cost. Enjoyment and the
development of individual skills should be the objective. Coaches
should be alert to and praise improvement. Athletic performance should
not be equated with personal worth (Coakley, p. 106). Players should
not be encouraged or allowed to play when injured or ill, as a
demonstration of stoic virtue.
- Stress participation. Hellstedt
(p.70) cites studies which show that many children 9-14 drop out of
sports because they spend too much time on the bench and not enough on
the field. They perceive themselves as unsuccessful because their
level of performance doesn't earn them more playing time. A study of
young male athletes indicated that 90% would rather have an
opportunity to play on a losing team than sit on the bench of a
winning team.
- Present positive role models.
Sports violence is most prevalent in professional sports. Coaches
should avoid symbolic associations with professional teams--e.g.
names, logos. They should not model their own coaching techniques on
those of professional coaches (Coakley, pp. 107-8). Weiser and Love
(p. 5) recommend that school coaches implement strategies to foster
feelings of team ownership among players, replacing the traditional
hierarchy--authoritarian coach, submissive players--that governs the
coach-player relationship in professional sports. Encourage input,
permit participation in decision-making, and listen to player
feedback. Feelings of team ownership foster team cohesiveness, which
in turn leads to better performance.
- Integrate values-oriented intervention
strategies into the curriculum. Waldzilak cites a
number of intervention strategies, utilizing Kohlberg's moral
development model and social learning theories, which have been shown
to produce improvement or modification of behavior, moral reasoning
and perceptions of sportsmanship (Wandzilak et al., p. 14). Teachers
and coaches should commit themselves to actively teaching positive
sports-related values, and devise curricula that do so.
- Involve parents. As the earliest
and potentially the most influential role models, parents can have a
critical impact on a child's attitudes towards sports. Physical
educators and coaches should inform parents of curricular activities
and goals, alert them to signs of anxiety or aggressive behavior,
encourage positive attitudes toward competition and physical activity,
and promote realistic expectations for performance (Hellstedt, pp.
69-70).
References
Coakley, Jay J. (1982) Sport in Society, Issues and
Controversies (Second Edition). St. Louis: C.V. Mosby Company.
Debendotte, Valerie. (1988, March) Spectator Violence at
Sports Events: What Keeps Enthusiastic Fans in Bounds? The Physician
and Sportsmedicine, 16 (4) 203-11. EJ 372 800.
Hellstedt, Jon C. (1988, April) Kids, Parents and Sport:
Some Questions and Answers. The Physician and Sportsmedicine, 16
(4) 59-71. EJ 376 620.
Lee, Martin J. (1985) From Rivalry to Hostility Among
Sports Fans. Quest, 37 (1) 38-49.
Leonard, Wilbert Marcellus. (1988) A Sociological
Perspective of Sport (Third Edition). New York, Macmillan Publishing
Company.
Roskosz, Francis M. (1988, Late Winter) The Paradoxes of
Play. The Physical Educator, 45 (1) 5-13. EJ 371 284.
Terry, Peter C. and Jackson, John J. (1985) The
Determinants and Control of Violence in Sport. Quest, 37 (1) 27-37.
Wandzilak, Thomas (1985). Values Development Through
Physical Education and Athletics. Quest, 37 (2) 176-85.
Wandzilak, Thomas, et al. (1988, October). Values
Development Through Physical Activity: Promoting Sportsmanlike Behaviors.
Perceptions and Moral Reasoning. Journal of Teaching in Physical
Education, 8 (1) 13-21.
Weiser, Kathy and Love, Phyllis (1988,
September-October). Who Owns Your Team? Strategies, 2 (1) 5-8.
This publication was prepared with funding from the
Office of Education Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education
under contract no. RI 8806 2015. The opinions expressed in this report do
not necessarily reflect the positions or policies of OERI or the
Department. |