Latest information on the possible causes of ADHD based on genetic and neurological research.
One of the first questions a parent will have is "Why? What went wrong?" "Did
I do something to cause this?" There is little compelling evidence at this time
that ADHD can arise purely from social factors or child-rearing methods. Most
substantiated causes appear to fall in the realm of neurobiology and genetics.
This is not to say that environmental factors may not influence the severity of
the disorder, and especially the degree of impairment and suffering the child
may experience, but that such factors do not seem to give rise to the condition
by themselves.
The parents' focus should be on looking forward and finding the best possible
way to help their child. Scientists are studying causes in an effort to identify
better ways to treat, and perhaps someday, to prevent ADHD. They are finding
more and more evidence that ADHD does not stem from the home environment, but
from biological causes. Knowing this can remove a huge burden of guilt from
parents who might blame themselves for their child's behavior.
Over the last few decades, scientists have come up with possible theories about
what causes ADHD. Some of these theories have led to dead ends, some to exciting
new avenues of investigation.
Studies have shown a possible correlation between the use of cigarettes and
alcohol during pregnancy and risk for ADHD in the offspring of that pregnancy.
As a precaution, it is best during pregnancy to refrain from both cigarette and
alcohol use.
Another environmental agent that may be associated with a higher risk of ADHD is
high levels of lead in the bodies of young preschool children. Since lead is no
longer allowed in paint and is usually found only in older buildings, exposure
to toxic levels is not as prevalent as it once was. Children who live in old
buildings in which lead still exists in the plumbing or in lead paint that has
been painted over may be at risk.
One early theory was that attention disorders were caused by brain injury. Some children who have suffered accidents leading to brain injury may show some signs of behavior similar to that of ADHD, but only a small percentage of children with ADHD have been found to have suffered a traumatic brain injury.
It has been suggested that attention disorders are caused by refined sugar or
food additives, or that symptoms of ADHD are exacerbated by sugar or food
additives. In 1982, the National Institutes of Health held a scientific
consensus conference to discuss this issue. It was found that diet restrictions
helped about 5 percent of children with ADHD, mostly young children who had food
allergies. A more recent study on the effect of sugar on children, using sugar
one day and a sugar substitute on alternate days, without parents, staff, or
children knowing which substance was being used, showed no significant effects
of the sugar on behavior or learning.
In another study, children whose mothers felt they were sugar-sensitive were
given aspartame as a substitute for sugar. Half the mothers were told their
children were given sugar, half that their children were given aspartame. The
mothers who thought their children had received sugar rated them as more
hyperactive than the other children and were more critical of their behavior.
Attention disorders often run in families, so there are likely to be genetic
influences. Studies indicate that 25 percent of the close relatives in the
families of ADHD children also have ADHD, whereas the rate is about 5 percent in
the general population. Many studies of twins now show that a strong genetic
influence exists in the disorder.
Researchers continue to study the genetic contribution to ADHD and to identify
the genes that cause a person to be susceptible to ADHD. Since its inception in
1999, the Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Molecular Genetics Network
has served as a way for researchers to share findings regarding possible genetic
influences on ADHD.
For a more in depth look at current genetics research related to ADHD we suggest
visiting
Neurotransmitter.net
Some knowledge of the structure of the brain is helpful in understanding the
research scientists are doing in searching for a physical basis for attention
deficit hyperactivity disorder. One part of the brain that scientists have
focused on in their search is the frontal lobes of the cerebrum. The frontal
lobes allow us to solve problems, plan ahead, understand the behavior of others,
and restrain our impulses. The two frontal lobes, the right and the left,
communicate with each other through the corpus callosum, (nerve fibers that
connect the right and left frontal lobes).
The basal ganglia are the interconnected gray masses deep in the cerebral
hemisphere that serve as the connection between the cerebrum and the cerebellum
and, with the cerebellum, are responsible for motor coordination. The cerebellum
is divided into three parts. The middle part is called the vermis.
All of these parts of the brain have been studied through the use of various
methods for seeing into or imaging the brain. These methods include functional
magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) positron emission tomography (PET), and single
photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). The main or central psychological
deficits in those with ADHD have been linked through these studies. By 2002 the
researchers in the NIMH Child Psychiatry Branch had studied 152 boys and girls
with ADHD, matched with 139 age- and gender-matched controls without ADHD. The
children were scanned at least twice, some as many as four times over a decade.
As a group, the ADHD children showed 3-4 percent smaller brain volumes in all
regions—the frontal lobes, temporal gray matter, caudate nucleus, and
cerebellum.
This study also showed that the ADHD children who were on medication had a white
matter volume that did not differ from that of controls. Those never-medicated
patients had an abnormally small volume of white matter. The white matter
consists of fibers that establish long-distance connections between brain
regions. It normally thickens as a child grows older and the brain matures.
Although this long-term study used MRI to scan the children's brains, the
researchers stressed that MRI remains a research tool and cannot be used to
diagnose ADHD in any given child. This is true for other neurological methods of
evaluating the brain, such as PET and SPECT.
[Above information excerpted from Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder a
publication of National Institute for Mental Health (2006) NIH Publication No.
3572]